I was sort of excited to see a small wave of what seem to be hip-hop theory books hitting the shelves, but the reviews coming in have sort of changed my mind… The first one that caught my attention was All About The Beat: Why Hip-Hop Can’t Save Black America by John McWhorter.
The LA Times gave this snippet:
Finally McWhorter asserts that “being art, especially popular art, hip-hop is automatically disqualified from being meaningfully political.” If this were true, the specifics of McWhorter’s musings would be irrelevant — even to him. Why write a book detailing the case against a particular form if you believe no art can be political? Why not do something else with your afternoon?
They end with a zinger:
For McWhorter, hip-hop may be all about the beat, but only because he isn’t listening.
The Boston Globe gives a rundown of All About The Beat next to Party Crashing: How the Hip-Hop Generation Declared Political Independence by Keli Goff, revealing the latter to be more about the political affiliations of hip-hop lovers than the politics present in the music. The Globe points out the point that both books are missing:
What does it say about the political impact of the hip-hop generation that the Democratic nominee is not only African-American but evidently fluent in hip-hop culture, and able to craft a message that speaks to the politically disaffected young people for whom hip-hop is the air they breathe? No more than rock ‘n’ roll, hip-hop will never revolutionize politics, but its ethos – of skepticism, of brash outspokenness, of unconscious diversity – will begin to seep into the mainstream of political discourse.
Most of the reviews tear huge holes in these books, from being so outdated that they are irrelevant to not quite bringing the game their titles promise (although another big promotion of the term “Hip Hop generation” from author Goff gets big props from The Globe). I’m not running to Borders anytime soon, except maybe to pick up this.